Tol Barad, the second

Shortly after my post about the silly honor gains in Tol Barad of last week, Blizzard announced their hotfix for the outdoor PVP zone which has settled all outcries about servers win-trading swiftly and effectively. Winning an attack game now awards players 360 honor points, as opposed to the previous 1800 (a successful defense still awards 180 points) – a change of astronomic proportions which now makes many a player think, why oh why he didn’t play Tol Barad in its early weeks of Cataclysm.

Yet, not all is well in Tol Barad: the general disproportion in difficulty between winning an attack or a defense game persists, to many a PvPers dismay. I’ve had time to finally join a few more Tol Barad games this last weekend and I haven’t been in a single one that won an attack. Keeping your defense is substantially easier which is doubly frustrating, considering that the zone is not only about honor gains but more daily quests for tokens and the Baradin Hold instance. Where players did not care to defend before, they are now doing their very best to keep their keeps; so we have pretty much switched one extreme for the other.

In a most recent blue post by Cory Stockton, Blizzard assures players that the re-balancing of Tol Barad is far from over: they are aware of the attack game issue and are looking to fix this in a future patch. What’s more revealing about the article, are the comments on how Blizzard have tried to learn from past mistakes of WotLK’s Wintergrasp and what their intentions for Tol Barad were initially, when designing the new outdoor PvP Zone –

Tol Barad is intentionally balanced so that it’s a challenge for the attackers, because we want to make sure that control of Tol Barad matters. For the defenders, there’s a sense of urgency that Wintergrasp didn’t have — if you lose it, you’re going to have a hell of a time taking it back. For the attackers, there are a number of rewards at stake — such as access to the Baradin Hold raid and additional daily quests — that we hope players feel are worth fighting for. That sort of tension is what we wanted from Wintergrasp, and what we believe Tol Barad can ultimately offer.

While the devs’ initial realization of this has failed, it is clear that they were looking to give the battle for victory a much greater meaning by adding more incentives to play well via the big honor difference, and also balancing the games in terms of player slots. I salute Blizzard’s decision to make attacking a challenge of consequence. Wintergrasp was never a meaningful, let alone epic place by any standard; if you lost a game, who cared? You would get a win sooner or later – the only time I was ever annoyed to be denied access to Wintegrasp was when I wanted to go buy some PvP gems or enchants.

This time around, Blizzard wants to add more meaning to conflict. And: they want a lot more people to join in. While you can decide to quest on the northern half of Tol Barad island exclusively in order to get your Baradin Wardens reputation and rewards, conquering the southern map is a considerable speed bonus for PvPers and PvErs alike. The reputation vendor sells a variety of special items (from vanity baubles such as a companion pet and two mounts, to useful blue items and epic trinkets) to attract a wide range of WoW players. There is also the commendation to convert extra tokens to more reputation, which means the more daily quests you can do, the faster your way to exalted and epic rewards (which all require to be bought by tokens too).

I absolutely love the look of the Drake of the West Wind (it looks a lot better live than on pictures) and I will obviously have to get the seagull. Apart from that the trinkets are actually quite nice, especially if you have no immediate access to epic raid loot (the healer trinket has been announced to receive a slight buff soon).

All things considered, I look forward to Tol Barad receiving another patch asap, as confirmed in the blue post and that they will find the right way to balance a battle which can be a great dilemma to balance.
And I also have high hopes that this time around Blizzard’s new PvP Zone will encourage a much greater player base to join in and fight more meaningful battles, rather than being “for them odd PvPers only”.


  1. I agree. I was delighted to read this post by Blizzard about Tol Barad. I think it is much more important than most people understand.

    Until today Blizzard fought a constant battle for fairness. Everywhere anywhere, anytime. Everything had to be fair on the lowest possible scale.

    With open PvP they discovered that this sabotages the meaning of things. Something the blogosphere has complained about a lot. Nothing seems to matter if things are fair on the lowest possible scale.

    Now, with, Cataclysm, Blizzard did something they haven’t done in a long time: Make something fair on a large scale, but unfair on a small scale!

    Thus you create meaning. It is the EVE Online is fair!

    I sometimes rush to defend Tol Barad, because I do not want to have to attack it. And I always attack it, because you aren’t given the chance that often.

    Was about to write a blog entry about it myself, but then i read yours 😉

  2. Haha, I’m sorry! ^^

    and I agree with you, it’s an interesting direction they’ve taken with this. a lot will depend on the re-balancing now though; whether they can find the middle ground or not. they will always try for some more balance, so I don’t think getting our hopes up too high in this respect is wise. but it’s a start. 😉

  3. When it comes to me, I am already satisfied. Tol Barad changes sides every few days (4-6) at our server.

    What’s unfortunate for Alliance is just that the Horde takes it back much faster, usually. But that’s obviously, not a problem of Tol Barad.

  4. You mean to say the alliance sucks at PVP =P

    now that would be an interesting topic…do more pvp-oriented players naturally gravitate towards rolling horde in WoW?

  5. I don’t know dude. I don’t think the importance of a zone should be “forced” upon players by making it much tougher for the attackers. This effectively implies that if two geared teams went at it in Tol Barad, the defending team would nearly always win because the zone is designed to let them be victorious. The sense of urgency should come from what’s at stake, not “I hope we don’t lose or we’ll never get it back.”

    IMHO that is just bad design principles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *